DMSBD
Tech Tips Aerodynamics, Submitted October 31, 2001
Aerodynamics Test Results - by
Amanda Karr
The tests were performed using the Tex Finsterwald coast
method. From a distance of 850 ft. from the finish line we performed 10 runs
down the hill. The first five runs were with the axle foils installed on the
car. The next five were performed without the axle foils installed on the car.
Each test number represents the distance the car traveled up the runoff hill
after the finish line. I will give you feet and inches and also dismal to
figure with a calculator.
With air foils installed: (Test #1 - 51'
4 5/8" 616.625) (Test # 2 - 51' 4 5/8" 616.625)
(Test # 3 - 52' 9 1/8" 633.125) (Test #4 - 53' 7 1/4" 643.25) (Test
#5 - 53' 7 1/4" 643.25)
Without airfoils installed: (Test # 6 -
50' 2 3/8" 602.375) (Test #7 - 50' 8 3/4" 608.75)
(Test # 8 - 52' 4" 628.) (Test # 9 - 54' 648.) (Test # 10
- 53' 6 5/8" 642.625)
NOTE: Weather conditions
have an affect on the tests.
Here are the conditions during the tests:
Test # 1- Overcast, Test # 2 - Overcast, Test # 3 - Some
Sun, Test # 4 - Overcast , Test # 5 - Overcast, Test # 6
- Overcast, Test # 7 - Overcast, Test # 8 - Sunny, Test # 9
- Sunny with tailwind, Test # 10 - Sunny with tailwind.
Final results
are as follows... With the airfoils installed on the car the average
distance traveled past the finish line from 850 feet up the track was 52' 5".
With the airfoils removed the average distance traveled past the finish line
from 850 up the track was 52' 1." Even with the last three runs with
preferable sunny and tailwind conditions the car still performed better with
the airfoils on an average of 4." Coast testing should really be performed on
a calm day with steady conditions. With limited people and only one driver
this is the method we chose. Also the car stopped within a distance of 45" for
all 10 runs ! down the hill. I would attribute that to driver consistency.